RAS EL HEKMA / THE CITY PRECINCT READER
City precincts, home collections and hotel names can sound like the same thing. Read how they fit together, what the sources establish and where the answer is still missing.
Reviewed 14 October 2026 · Modon’s current city page and supplied plan editions
MODON / THE CITY AND ITS PRECINCTS
Start with Modon’s city diagram. Then look inside Wadi, compare the source drawings and see which names still need a verified place or status.
Overview checked 15 October 2026 · source drawings keep their own dates
On this drawing: Wadi Yemm. The ring is a source reading point, not an entrance or a surveyed boundary.
Original artwork © Modon. Each drawing stays in its own frame. No satellite alignment or surveyed precinct boundary is implied.
Wadi Yemm on Modon’s city diagram. The gold area is Modon’s original highlight.
HOW THE NAMES FIT TOGETHER
A home collection, hotel or construction package is not another city precinct.
The first launched precinct named by Modon.
These names appear in sales material or published marketing. That does not give each one a verified launch day or current stock.
Links and Views remain separate names. Lighthouse Village is not silently matched to the Iconic Lighthouse component.
Individual names, launch states and boundaries are not verified.
Unknown does not mean definitely unannounced.Older working names can be read on their own drawing. They are not assigned to the unnamed divisions here.
Understand work packages and map keys →A SEPARATE RELATIONSHIP TO CHECK
Palm Hills and Miran document their collaboration; Palm Hills reports an August 2026 launch event. The Modon diagram does not identify its precinct. Hacienda is not counted as an eighteenth precinct or pinned to an unnamed shape.
Read Hacienda’s own plan →All earlier readers and downloads remain available below. A reported award, brochure key or working name is kept separate from an announced city precinct.
City framework
Modon describes a city with 17 precincts. Wadi Yemm is the named first launch.
Still unknown: A complete current list of individual precinct names, IDs, boundaries and release dates is not established.
No verified publication day
Read more →Announced
Named by Modon as the first launched precinct. The FY2025 results report initial sales; the H1 2026 results describe a later phase in April.
Still unknown: The exact first-launch day and the identity or boundary of the April phase are not established by those reports.
2026-02-18 · FY2025 results publication; not the launch day
Read more →Individual status unknown
The city total leaves 16 precincts beyond Wadi. Older working names can be studied separately.
Still unknown: Their individual current launch states are unverified. Unknown does not mean unannounced, cancelled or unsold.
No verified publication day
Read more →In supplied material
Named in the supplied colour sheet and Boulevard brochure. Layouts, room dimensions and dated price evidence have separate readers.
Still unknown: The colour sheet does not establish live stock, a launch day or the surveyed boundary for a selected home.
2026-10-02 · Brochure received; publication day unknown
Read more →Published marketing
Appears in supplied plans and is also promoted as an apartment collection on the Ras El Hekma project profile.
Still unknown: The inspected posts do not provide a verified absolute launch date or a current unit list.
No verified publication day
Read more →In supplied material
Separately named on the supplied colour sheet. Some brochure legends group East and West; the Wadi East drawing separates them.
Still unknown: No launch day, approved cross-edition parcel identity or live home allocation is established here.
2026-09-25 · Colour illustration shared; publication day unknown
Read more →In supplied material
Separately named on the supplied colour sheet. Some brochure legends group East and West; the Wadi East drawing separates them.
Still unknown: No launch day, approved cross-edition parcel identity or live home allocation is established here.
2026-09-25 · Colour illustration shared; publication day unknown
Read more →Published marketing
Has a Modon product page. An indexed repost on Modon’s company profile carries a launch statement from the project profile.
Still unknown: The absolute day of that post is unverified. Marketing availability does not confirm present stock, price or handover.
No verified publication day
Read more →Published marketing
The project profile markets Yemm Views as a villa collection, beyond its appearance in the brochure legends.
Still unknown: The post’s absolute publication day and the exact home site are unverified. A similar name does not establish a Links-to-Views rename.
No verified publication day
Read more →In supplied material
A named villa collection in the supplied material and home-layout reader.
Still unknown: An exact public launch day, current stock and a surveyed collection boundary are not established in this register.
No verified publication day
Read more →In supplied material
The colour sheet prints YEMM LINKS. The three brochure legends use Links Villas; they also name Views separately.
Still unknown: A common parcel identity across the different labels and drawings has not been approved.
No verified publication day
Read more →In supplied material
Named on the supplied colour illustration. June’s plan separately names an Iconic Lighthouse component.
Still unknown: The two labels do not establish one approved site, one product or a shared operator. No launch day is verified.
2026-09-25 · Colour illustration shared; publication day unknown
Read more →Announced
Modon’s formal announcement names the hotel and residences within Wadi.
Still unknown: The announcement is not an opening certificate, current inventory or proof of rights for another home collection.
2026-05-17 · Formal partnership announcement
Read more →Announced
Modon’s dated announcement places the destination within Wadi.
Still unknown: A brand announcement does not establish an operating resort, exact home allocation or access for other owners.
2026-07-16 · Formal partnership announcement
Read more →Launch reported · precinct unknown
Palm Hills and Miran document their collaboration. Palm Hills’ August 2026 media entry reports the Hacienda Ras El Hekma launch event. Its Modon precinct assignment remains a separate question.
Still unknown: The reviewed Modon city diagram does not identify Hacienda’s precinct or a matching boundary.
2026-08 · Palm Hills launch-event coverage month; exact day unknown
Read more →Use these complete images when you want to read every printed label. They are not eight dates of construction or a matched sequence of approved revisions.
Modon’s public city description was checked again on 15 October 2026: seventeen precincts, with Wadi as the first launch. The guide does not have a complete approved named precinct register. “Unknown” does not mean cancelled, unsold or definitely unannounced.
The city ring uses an already accepted Wadi reading point. The three brochure plans use exact original circle centres, radii and legend labels from the retained source audit. A grouped East/West key stays grouped. Generic hotel symbols are not assigned to Montage or Nammos. Links and Views are not joined. The older Pending-Approval drawing supplies working names, not a current launch register.
The June figure “17+ precincts & free zone” remains a separate source statement. Airport, business and service systems are not added as extra residential precincts. A development relationship does not establish a matching parcel or a property’s rights.
Neutral sharing includes only the selected public name, drawing and bounded viewing window. No personal notes, other URL values, enquiry or new tracking event is sent. The saved reader includes every drawing, status, control and both exports. Other guide and original source links need internet.
Find a map, date or work package: search the saved readers, guide entries and source records →
Behind the city plan: ground investigations, marine studies and the meaning of nature labels →
What is announced, and where does it fit? Open the map with linked evidence → · Compare the names and unknowns →
The last few kilometres: Explore Fukah’s coastal-road connections, railway bridges and footbridge →
Beach, cliff, lagoon or canal? Explore the six shoreline types on Modon’s original drawing →
Announced, marketed or still unknown? Read the city release register →
Wadi’s home names: Compare the supplied colour map with three brochure drawings →
Inside Wadi Yemm: Explore all fifteen June components and compare the October labels →
MODON CITY ATLAS / START HERE
Three map views answer three different questions: where Modon highlights Wadi, where older working names appear, and how home collections fit inside Wadi.
Reviewed 15 October 2026 · independent guide · original maps © Modon
Modon’s current city framework.
A launch is separate from completion.
We have not verified a complete current named register.
Public city diagram. Wadi Yemm selected. Other precinct names are not assigned to the unnamed shapes.
SELECTED ON THE MAP / City precinct
First city launch named
Named by Modon as the first launched precinct. The FY2025 results report initial sales; the H1 2026 results describe a later phase in April.
Modon’s public diagram names and highlights Wadi. Separately, the older working plan prints its name and marker. A closed drawing shape is retained in the detailed map book. Approval and a current boundary on the ground are unverified.
The exact first-launch day and the identity or boundary of the April phase are not established by those reports.
The February 2026 results describe initial sales during FY2025. The report date is not the launch date.
This is the publication day of the company results, not an exact day for the first Wadi launch.
The H1 report says a new Wadi phase launched in April. It does not identify that phase with a precinct ID, named collection, M1 or Phase 1A.
Reports on the six months ended 30 June, including the April phase and later Montage debut. Publication and event dates remain separate.
Reviewed 2026-10-15. A company report, source edition, attachment receipt and formal announcement date describe different events.
modon working city labels · modon city status oct15 · modon fy2025 launch results · modon h1 2026 launch sequenceThe panel follows the name selected above. Known relationships and verified map positions are separate questions.
Each map keeps the positions from its own document. A name on the working plan is not automatically a confirmed current precinct. No working labels are placed on the public diagram, and no plan is stretched to fit a satellite map.
On Modon’s public city diagram, Wadi is highlighted and named. The other shapes have no individual launch status in that diagram. Their colour does not prove they are announced or unannounced.
Boulevard, Beach Plaza, East & West, Waterfront, Views, Fairways and Links are seven grouped home collections in the guide. Montage and Nammos are announced hospitality destinations within Wadi. They are not added as new city precincts.
For the other sixteen precincts, the approved names, individual launch dates, boundaries and entrances remain unverified here. An older name or a film scene alone cannot fill those gaps.
ONE DIRECTORY / DIFFERENT SCALES
This directory combines nineteen working labels, nine Wadi collection or hospitality groups, the other-precinct question, Hacienda and city systems. These thirty-one entries are not thirty-one precincts.
31 entries shown. Different scales; not a precinct count.
| Name / question | Scale | What is established | What still needs an answer |
|---|---|---|---|
| First launch named | City precinct | Modon names Wadi Yemm as the first city launch. The working drawing also prints its name. | Whole-precinct completion, current home availability and working entrances. Full entry → |
| Current status unknown | Working place name | The name is printed on the older working city drawing. Its filename says Pending-Approval. | Current approved precinct identity, individual launch date, exact boundary and entrance. Full entry → |
| Current status unknown | Working place name | The name is printed on the older working city drawing. Its filename says Pending-Approval. | Current approved precinct identity, individual launch date, exact boundary and entrance. Full entry → |
| Current status unknown | Working place name | The name is printed on the older working city drawing. Its filename says Pending-Approval. | Current approved precinct identity, individual launch date, exact boundary and entrance. Full entry → |
| Current status unknown | Working zone label | The name is printed on the older working city drawing. Its filename says Pending-Approval. | Current approved precinct identity, individual launch date, exact boundary and entrance. Full entry → |
| Current status unknown | Working place name | The name is printed on the older working city drawing. Its filename says Pending-Approval. | Current approved precinct identity, individual launch date, exact boundary and entrance. Full entry → |
| Current status unknown | Working place name | The name is printed on the older working city drawing. Its filename says Pending-Approval. | Current approved precinct identity, individual launch date, exact boundary and entrance. Full entry → |
| Current status unknown | Working place name | The name is printed on the older working city drawing. Its filename says Pending-Approval. | Current approved precinct identity, individual launch date, exact boundary and entrance. Full entry → |
| Current status unknown | Working place name | The name is printed on the older working city drawing. Its filename says Pending-Approval. | Current approved precinct identity, individual launch date, exact boundary and entrance. Full entry → |
| Current status unknown | Working place name | The name is printed on the older working city drawing. Its filename says Pending-Approval. | Current approved precinct identity, individual launch date, exact boundary and entrance. Full entry → |
| Current status unknown | Working place name | The name is printed on the older working city drawing. Its filename says Pending-Approval. | Current approved precinct identity, individual launch date, exact boundary and entrance. Full entry → |
| Current status unknown | Working place name | The name is printed on the older working city drawing. Its filename says Pending-Approval. | Current approved precinct identity, individual launch date, exact boundary and entrance. Full entry → |
| Current status unknown | Working place name | The name is printed on the older working city drawing. Its filename says Pending-Approval. | Current approved precinct identity, individual launch date, exact boundary and entrance. Full entry → |
| Current status unknown | Working place name | The name is printed on the older working city drawing. Its filename says Pending-Approval. | Current approved precinct identity, individual launch date, exact boundary and entrance. Full entry → |
| Current status unknown | Working place name | The name is printed on the older working city drawing. Its filename says Pending-Approval. | Current approved precinct identity, individual launch date, exact boundary and entrance. Full entry → |
| Current status unknown | Working place name | The name is printed on the older working city drawing. Its filename says Pending-Approval. | Current approved precinct identity, individual launch date, exact boundary and entrance. Full entry → |
| Current status unknown | Working place name | The name is printed on the older working city drawing. Its filename says Pending-Approval. | Current approved precinct identity, individual launch date, exact boundary and entrance. Full entry → |
| Current status unknown | Working place name | The name is printed on the older working city drawing. Its filename says Pending-Approval. | Current approved precinct identity, individual launch date, exact boundary and entrance. Full entry → |
| Current status unknown | Working marine label | The name is printed on the older working city drawing. Its filename says Pending-Approval. | Current approved precinct identity, individual launch date, exact boundary and entrance. Full entry → |
| Individual status unknown | City framework remainder | Modon describes seventeen precincts and names Wadi as the first launch. Sixteen is the remainder of that framework. | A complete named current register and the individual launch status of those sixteen. Unknown does not mean definitely unannounced. Full entry → |
| Documented home collection | Within Wadi Yemm | Documented apartment collection inside Wadi. Read its own plan, areas and dated offers. | Plan names and illustration positions do not establish current stock, gates or a home-specific handover date. Full entry → |
| Documented home collection | Within Wadi Yemm | Documented apartment collection inside Wadi. The June material and supplied film describe this collection. | Plan names and illustration positions do not establish current stock, gates or a home-specific handover date. Full entry → |
| Documented home collection | Within Wadi Yemm | The supplied material describes villas and townhouses within Wadi; East and West remain distinct home collections. | Plan names and illustration positions do not establish current stock, gates or a home-specific handover date. Full entry → |
| Documented home collection | Within Wadi Yemm | The supplied factsheet describes apartments, duplexes and townhouses between the canal, golf and waterfront. | Plan names and illustration positions do not establish current stock, gates or a home-specific handover date. Full entry → |
| Documented home collection | Within Wadi Yemm | A named home collection on the September Wadi plan. | Plan names and illustration positions do not establish current stock, gates or a home-specific handover date. Full entry → |
| Documented home collection | Within Wadi Yemm | A named home collection on the September Wadi plan. | Plan names and illustration positions do not establish current stock, gates or a home-specific handover date. Full entry → |
| Documented home collection | Within Wadi Yemm | A named villa collection on the September Wadi plan. | Plan names and illustration positions do not establish current stock, gates or a home-specific handover date. Full entry → |
| Hospitality announced | Within Wadi Yemm | Modon announced Montage in Wadi Yemm on 17 May 2026. Its resort and private residences are one hospitality destination within the precinct. | Its position is not assigned to a generic hotel symbol on the June or September drawing. Bookings and owner rights need separate checks. Full entry → |
| Hospitality announced | Within Wadi Yemm | Modon announced Nammos within Wadi Yemm on 16 July 2026, with resort, residences, dining and retail components. | The announcement does not identify a current city precinct number or confirm that the beach club is open. Full entry → |
| Precinct connection unknown | Separate city relationship | Palm Hills and Miran name their partnership. Other company material links Miran to the wider city. The exact city precinct is not confirmed. | Modon’s current diagram does not name Hacienda or assign it to a numbered precinct. It is not counted as an eighteenth precinct. Full entry → |
| Planned city systems | Across the city | The supplied June toolkit describes airport, marinas, transit, business district, free zone and an education/health programme across the city. | A planned system or district use is not an individually verified precinct launch, timetable, service directory or tax advice. Full entry → |
No matching entries. Try a shorter name or choose all entries.
They form another layer of the city story. A contract award, reported site work and an operating service describe different stages. These records are not used to colour whole precincts as complete.
Awarded package
ACC identifies a 54-villa and clubhouse package within Wadi Yemm–M1, with roads, utilities, public spaces and Wadi Park. Its 21-month programme has no verified start date here.
DP04 is a contractor package label. It is not a new city precinct or a confirmed package boundary. The 21 months cannot give a calendar completion date without a start date.
Read the scope →Works reported
The contractor reports about 17 km of six-lane road with utility networks, intended to support Phase 1.
The reported length does not locate the road line, establish public access or show which home has working utility connections.
Read the scope →Works reported
The contractor reports 5.3 km of dry bulk excavation for the Grand Canal.
Excavation is not confirmation of a filled or navigable canal. No accepted route, working berth or direct match to every canal-side home is established.
Read the scope →Awarded package
The award covers a 200-key hotel, 96 private branded villas, clubhouse and associated works. Modon’s separate announcement places Montage in Wadi.
Hotel keys and private villas are different counts. The award does not establish opening, ownership rights, a home handover or the exact works boundary.
Read the scope →Design and construction award
The design capacity is 32,000 m³ per day. The announced process treats sewage for intended reuse in irrigation and district cooling.
Design capacity is not actual daily flow. This is not drinking-water supply or proof that the plant or a household connection is commissioned.
Read the scope →MoU / cooperation
The earlier MoU explores construction and infrastructure cooperation, including energy and water-related work.
A broad MoU is separate from a named construction award. We do not infer that all later packages are one contract or occupy one area.
Read the scope →Opening preparations reported
The dated government visit report describes final opening preparations. Separate brand material identifies Portaluna as a Morgans Originals property.
The visit report does not explicitly make Portaluna one of Wadi’s six hotels. Its city precinct, entrance, guest opening and bookable dates remain unestablished here.
Read the scope →MoU / cooperation
The agreement covers retail cooperation across Modon’s UAE and Egypt portfolio and the search for suitable sites.
The release does not name a Ras El Hekma store. No precinct, store pin, opening, local delivery or grocery service is assigned from it.
Read the scope →The current Modon page was checked 15 October 2026. Its diagram was freshly retrieved at 2000 × 900 pixels and visually inspected; the publisher does not state its publication date. Earlier retained editions remain unchanged. Original maps and drawings © Modon. The working brochure is a third-party-hosted copy with Pending-Approval in its filename; publication and approval are not established. Its native paths, labels and marker centres stay in PDF page coordinates. The September and two October Wadi plans keep their own image coordinates. October’s two brochures use different numbered legends; no September reading point is copied onto either. The SVG sheet uses a JPEG rendering of the complete September source image; the saved reader keeps the original WebP bytes.
A new official named register would establish the other precinct identities. An individual launch announcement would change a launch reading. A registered plan would support boundary mapping. A completion certificate, operator notice or home-specific confirmation would answer a different question. These are separate updates.
Current city description and diagram · Working-plan record · September plan record. More detail remains below: all film/name comparisons, six original plan editions, work packages, land and legal records.
MODON / CITY STATUS AT A GLANCE
Read the city, the names inside Wadi and the older working labels together. The table keeps the map evidence beside each announcement, so you can see what is known and what still needs an answer.
Wadi Yemm is the first launch named by Modon. The current individual identities and release states of the other sixteen are not verified here.
Home collections, Montage and Nammos sit within Wadi. They are not added to the count of city precincts.
Seventeen place labels, one zone label and one marine label. This is a document reading, not a verified match to the current 17-precinct framework.
Announced, supplied and operating are different. The labels describe the available evidence. They do not rank construction progress or confirm that a home is for sale today.
| Name / scale | What is documented | What the map locates | Still unconfirmed |
|---|---|---|---|
| City precinctFirst city launch named | Named by Modon as the first launched precinct. The FY2025 results report initial sales; the H1 2026 results describe a later phase in April. Wadi Yemm: 2026-02-18 · FY2025 results publication; not the launch day | Modon’s public diagram names and highlights Wadi. Separately, the older working plan prints its name and marker. A closed drawing shape is retained in the detailed map book. Approval and a current boundary on the ground are unverified. | The exact first-launch day and the identity or boundary of the April phase are not established by those reports. Full entry → |
| City framework remainderIndividual launch status unknown | The city total leaves 16 precincts beyond Wadi. Older working names can be studied separately. The other 16 precincts: Exact day unknown · No verified publication day | The public diagram leaves the other divisions unnamed. No working name is assigned to an unnamed shape. | Their individual current launch states are unverified. Unknown does not mean unannounced, cancelled or unsold. Full entry → |
| Name / scale | What is documented | What the map locates | Still unconfirmed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Within Wadi YemmSupplied material | Named in the supplied colour sheet and Boulevard brochure. Layouts, room dimensions and dated price evidence have separate readers. Yemm Boulevard: 2026-10-02 · Brochure received; publication day unknown | A reading point is available on Inside Wadi · September 2026. It marks a source illustration, not a home, gate or surveyed boundary. | The colour sheet does not establish live stock, a launch day or the surveyed boundary for a selected home. Full entry → |
| Within Wadi YemmPublisher marketing | Appears in supplied plans and is also promoted as an apartment collection on the Ras El Hekma project profile. Yemm Beach Plaza: Exact day unknown · No verified publication day | A reading point is available on Inside Wadi · September 2026. It marks a source illustration, not a home, gate or surveyed boundary. | The inspected posts do not provide a verified absolute launch date or a current unit list. Full entry → |
| Within Wadi YemmSupplied material | Separately named on the supplied colour sheet. Some brochure legends group East and West; the Wadi East drawing separates them. Separately named on the supplied colour sheet. Some brochure legends group East and West; the Wadi East drawing separates them. Wadi East: 2026-09-25 · Colour illustration shared; publication day unknown Wadi West: 2026-09-25 · Colour illustration shared; publication day unknown | A reading point is available on Inside Wadi · September 2026. It marks a source illustration, not a home, gate or surveyed boundary. | No launch day, approved cross-edition parcel identity or live home allocation is established here. No launch day, approved cross-edition parcel identity or live home allocation is established here. Full entry → |
| Within Wadi YemmPublisher marketing | Has a Modon product page. An indexed repost on Modon’s company profile carries a launch statement from the project profile. Waterfront Residences: Exact day unknown · No verified publication day | This overview has no verified point for this name in its displayed source frames. The relationship may be known while the exact site remains unknown. | The absolute day of that post is unverified. Marketing availability does not confirm present stock, price or handover. Full entry → |
| Within Wadi YemmPublisher marketing | The project profile markets Yemm Views as a villa collection, beyond its appearance in the brochure legends. Yemm Views: Exact day unknown · No verified publication day | A reading point is available on Inside Wadi · September 2026. It marks a source illustration, not a home, gate or surveyed boundary. | The post’s absolute publication day and the exact home site are unverified. A similar name does not establish a Links-to-Views rename. Full entry → |
| Within Wadi YemmSupplied material | A named villa collection in the supplied material and home-layout reader. Fairways Villas: Exact day unknown · No verified publication day | A reading point is available on Inside Wadi · September 2026. It marks a source illustration, not a home, gate or surveyed boundary. | An exact public launch day, current stock and a surveyed collection boundary are not established in this register. Full entry → |
| Within Wadi YemmSupplied material | The colour sheet prints YEMM LINKS. The three brochure legends use Links Villas; they also name Views separately. Yemm Links / Links Villas: Exact day unknown · No verified publication day | A reading point is available on Inside Wadi · September 2026. It marks a source illustration, not a home, gate or surveyed boundary. | A common parcel identity across the different labels and drawings has not been approved. Full entry → |
| Within Wadi YemmDated company record | Modon’s formal announcement names the hotel and residences within Wadi. Montage Ras El Hekma: 2026-05-17 · Formal partnership announcement | This overview has no verified point for this name in its displayed source frames. The relationship may be known while the exact site remains unknown. | The announcement is not an opening certificate, current inventory or proof of rights for another home collection. Full entry → |
| Within Wadi YemmDated company record | Modon’s dated announcement places the destination within Wadi. Nammos Ras El Hekma: 2026-07-16 · Formal partnership announcement | This overview has no verified point for this name in its displayed source frames. The relationship may be known while the exact site remains unknown. | A brand announcement does not establish an operating resort, exact home allocation or access for other owners. Full entry → |
| Name / scale | What is documented | What the map locates | Still unconfirmed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Working place nameWorking name; current status unknown | The name is printed on the older working city drawing. Its filename says Pending-Approval. | The name and marker are printed on the older working city plan. A closed drawing shape is retained in the detailed map book. Approval and a current boundary on the ground are unverified. | Current approved precinct identity, individual launch date, exact boundary and entrance. Full entry → |
| Working place nameWorking name; current status unknown | The name is printed on the older working city drawing. Its filename says Pending-Approval. | The name and marker are printed on the older working city plan. A closed drawing shape is retained in the detailed map book. Approval and a current boundary on the ground are unverified. | Current approved precinct identity, individual launch date, exact boundary and entrance. Full entry → |
| Working place nameWorking name; current status unknown | The name is printed on the older working city drawing. Its filename says Pending-Approval. | The name and marker are printed on the older working city plan. A closed drawing shape is retained in the detailed map book. Approval and a current boundary on the ground are unverified. | Current approved precinct identity, individual launch date, exact boundary and entrance. Full entry → |
| Working zone labelWorking name; current status unknown | The name is printed on the older working city drawing. Its filename says Pending-Approval. | The name and marker are printed on the older working city plan. A closed drawing shape is retained in the detailed map book. Approval and a current boundary on the ground are unverified. | Current approved precinct identity, individual launch date, exact boundary and entrance. Full entry → |
| Working place nameWorking name; current status unknown | The name is printed on the older working city drawing. Its filename says Pending-Approval. | The name and marker are printed on the older working city plan. A closed drawing shape is retained in the detailed map book. Approval and a current boundary on the ground are unverified. | Current approved precinct identity, individual launch date, exact boundary and entrance. Full entry → |
| Working place nameWorking name; current status unknown | The name is printed on the older working city drawing. Its filename says Pending-Approval. | The name and marker are printed on the older working city plan. A closed drawing shape is retained in the detailed map book. Approval and a current boundary on the ground are unverified. | Current approved precinct identity, individual launch date, exact boundary and entrance. Full entry → |
| Working place nameWorking name; current status unknown | The name is printed on the older working city drawing. Its filename says Pending-Approval. | The name and marker are printed on the older working city plan. A closed drawing shape is retained in the detailed map book. Approval and a current boundary on the ground are unverified. | Current approved precinct identity, individual launch date, exact boundary and entrance. Full entry → |
| Working place nameWorking name; current status unknown | The name is printed on the older working city drawing. Its filename says Pending-Approval. | The name and marker are printed on the older working city plan. A closed drawing shape is retained in the detailed map book. Approval and a current boundary on the ground are unverified. | Current approved precinct identity, individual launch date, exact boundary and entrance. Full entry → |
| Working place nameWorking name; current status unknown | The name is printed on the older working city drawing. Its filename says Pending-Approval. | The name and marker are printed on the older working city plan. A closed drawing shape is retained in the detailed map book. Approval and a current boundary on the ground are unverified. | Current approved precinct identity, individual launch date, exact boundary and entrance. Full entry → |
| Working place nameWorking name; current status unknown | The name is printed on the older working city drawing. Its filename says Pending-Approval. | The name and marker are printed on the older working city plan. A closed drawing shape is retained in the detailed map book. Approval and a current boundary on the ground are unverified. | Current approved precinct identity, individual launch date, exact boundary and entrance. Full entry → |
| Working place nameWorking name; current status unknown | The name is printed on the older working city drawing. Its filename says Pending-Approval. | The name and marker are printed on the older working city plan. A closed drawing shape is retained in the detailed map book. Approval and a current boundary on the ground are unverified. | Current approved precinct identity, individual launch date, exact boundary and entrance. Full entry → |
| Working place nameWorking name; current status unknown | The name is printed on the older working city drawing. Its filename says Pending-Approval. | The name and marker are printed on the older working city plan. A closed drawing shape is retained in the detailed map book. Approval and a current boundary on the ground are unverified. | Current approved precinct identity, individual launch date, exact boundary and entrance. Full entry → |
| Working place nameWorking name; current status unknown | The name is printed on the older working city drawing. Its filename says Pending-Approval. | The name and marker are printed on the older working city plan. A closed drawing shape is retained in the detailed map book. Approval and a current boundary on the ground are unverified. | Current approved precinct identity, individual launch date, exact boundary and entrance. Full entry → |
| Working place nameWorking name; current status unknown | The name is printed on the older working city drawing. Its filename says Pending-Approval. | The name and marker are printed on the older working city plan. A closed drawing shape is retained in the detailed map book. Approval and a current boundary on the ground are unverified. | Current approved precinct identity, individual launch date, exact boundary and entrance. Full entry → |
| Working place nameWorking name; current status unknown | The name is printed on the older working city drawing. Its filename says Pending-Approval. | The name and marker are printed on the older working city plan. A closed drawing shape is retained in the detailed map book. Approval and a current boundary on the ground are unverified. | Current approved precinct identity, individual launch date, exact boundary and entrance. Full entry → |
| Working place nameWorking name; current status unknown | The name is printed on the older working city drawing. Its filename says Pending-Approval. | The name and marker are printed on the older working city plan. No separate closed shape has been established for this label. Approval and a current boundary on the ground are unverified. | Current approved precinct identity, individual launch date, exact boundary and entrance. Full entry → |
| Working place nameWorking name; current status unknown | The name is printed on the older working city drawing. Its filename says Pending-Approval. | The name and marker are printed on the older working city plan. A closed drawing shape is retained in the detailed map book. Approval and a current boundary on the ground are unverified. | Current approved precinct identity, individual launch date, exact boundary and entrance. Full entry → |
| Working marine labelWorking name; current status unknown | The name is printed on the older working city drawing. Its filename says Pending-Approval. | The name and marker are printed on the older working city plan. No separate closed shape has been established for this label. Approval and a current boundary on the ground are unverified. | Current approved precinct identity, individual launch date, exact boundary and entrance. Full entry → |
| Name / scale | What is documented | What the map locates | Still unconfirmed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Separate city relationshipSeparate city relationship | Palm Hills material documents the project and its own plan. The guide treats its relationship to Modon’s city separately. Hacienda Ras El Hekma / Miran Hills: Exact day unknown · No verified publication day | Use the separate Hacienda plan. No verified match to a Modon precinct or a division in the public diagram is established. | No approved Modon precinct ID or registered match to a division on the city diagram is established. Full entry → |
| Across the cityPlanned city systems | The supplied June toolkit describes airport, marinas, transit, business district, free zone and an education/health programme across the city. | This overview has no verified point for this name in its displayed source frames. The relationship may be known while the exact site remains unknown. | A planned system or district use is not an individually verified precinct launch, timetable, service directory or tax advice. Full entry → |
Reviewed 2026-10-15. Thirty-one entries at different scales; these are not thirty-one precincts. The full older readers and map editions remain available below.
THE CITY / WORKING NAMES IN THEIR ORIGINAL PLAN
A Modon-branded technical brochure shows names that are missing from the current public diagram. Its filename is marked Pending-Approval. Read those names on their own drawing, then compare the current diagram.
Working document · publication date unknown · approval not verified · reviewed 15 October 2026
Wadi Yemm: first launch independently identified. The working drawing is not a verified current precinct register.
These are categories used to read the source. They are not official precinct IDs. Seventeen place labels and Modon’s current seventeen-precinct count have the same number; that does not prove they identify the same set of places.
The adjacent page is design artwork from the same working brochure. It does not identify which areas are built, open or approved today.
It shows nineteen names and their marker positions. It comes from a public third-party copy with a Pending-Approval filename. The PDF creation date is 22 May 2025; that is not proof of publication or approval.
Modon’s page describes seventeen precincts and Wadi as the first launch. Its public city diagram names Wadi, but does not provide an individually named seventeen-precinct register.
The other working names’ current identities, launch dates, approved boundaries and entrances. No name is assigned an invented current precinct number, and no working outline is placed onto a geographic coastline.
| Source label | Reading category | Current individual status verified here |
|---|---|---|
| Wadi Yemm | Place label | Wadi independently identified as the first launch |
| Canal Beach | Place label | Not verified |
| West Beach | Place label | Not verified |
| Parklands | Place label | Not verified |
| Special Free Zone | Zone label | Not verified |
| Central Hills | Place label | Not verified |
| East Coast Gateway | Place label | Not verified |
| South Beach | Place label | Not verified |
| East Coast | Place label | Not verified |
| Central Business District North | Place label | Not verified |
| VIP Community | Place label | Not verified |
| Central Business District South | Place label | Not verified |
| West Coast Gateway South | Place label | Not verified |
| West Coast Gateway North | Place label | Not verified |
| West Dunes | Place label | Not verified |
| Marina | Place label | Not verified |
| North Point Island | Place label | Not verified |
| The Groves | Place label | Not verified |
| International Marina | Marine label | Not verified |
The public PDF copy was downloaded again over normal TLS and matches the retained September copy byte for byte. Its filename explicitly says Pending-Approval; the guide has no independent approval or publication record. Modon’s current public page text was checked separately on 15 October. The current diagram retains the original image copy reviewed 28 September, with its source date unknown.
The redrawn map uses the original page 12 PDF paths and all nineteen white marker centres in the PDF page’s own top-left coordinate frame. Guide colours and selection rings are added. Source points are reading markers, not buildings, entrances or surveyed locations. No approximate geographic registration, current parcel transfer or invented precinct ID is added. Select the original page to check the full labels and leader lines. The two marina labels remain separate.
The current diagram receives no copied working-name markers. A matching word in the concept film is a text comparison only. The Special Free Zone label is not assumed to have the government decision’s exact boundary or an eighteenth precinct identity.
Working brochure provenance · Current Modon framework · Separate land and legal-zone records.
THE WORKING CITY PLAN / A CLOSER LOOK
Focus on one working name, then use the small context map to see its position in the original drawing. The dashed rectangle is the drawing window, not a property boundary.
Wadi Yemm - source drawing outline; current geographic boundary unverified.
The complete PDF has a city overview, nineteen named detail pages and a source-method page. Vector drawings stay sharp when you zoom. Click a name on its opening page to go straight to that drawing.
Sixteen place labels and the free-zone label have explicit closed source outlines. North Point Island and International Marina stay point-only. Those counts describe the working drawing, not the current seventeen-precinct register.
All outlines come from explicitly closed paths on page 12 of the same Pending-Approval technical brochure used in the working-name reader. Original marker containment and complete-page visual checks establish the link to sixteen place labels and the free-zone label. Wadi’s original filled highlight is used without counting its duplicate outline twice.
North Point Island’s separate outline is not established by the open coastline stroke. International Marina is not assigned the surrounding Marina land shape. No missing line is invented to close either outline. The windows use PDF page coordinates only; no physical areas, distances, adjacency, roads, geographic registration or current precinct IDs are inferred.
The map book retains source credits, unknown approval/publication dates, complete name coverage and current-status limits. Read the source method · Return to the complete labelled drawing.
THE CITY / ITS DESIGN / ITS DELIVERY
A city map tells only part of the story. These complete publisher illustrations show three intended settings: the wider city, an urban centre and homes around open space. Read them beside the named drawings above, with their different purposes in mind.
Design illustrations, not site photographs or an approved zoning map · reviewed 15 October 2026
KEEP EACH VIEW AT ITS OWN SCALE
The illustrations have no complete precinct-name key. The guide therefore adds no district outlines, hotel pins or property labels to them.
Use the working-name map to find a name in that source drawing. Use the current Modon diagram to read its verified Wadi highlight. Use the regional map for geographic context. Positions are not transferred between those different views.
Read the complete labelled working drawing →WHO SHAPES WHAT?
The masterplanner describes one city-scale framework, delivered in phases, with green space, transport links and infrastructure.
A city framework does not supply a launch date or approved boundary for every precinct.
The adviser describes research, financial feasibility, hotel positioning, brand selection and coordination with operators for the Wadi hospitality scope.
An advisory role does not make WATG the hotel operator, home seller or designer of every building.
A LONG-TERM CITY FRAMEWORK
The masterplanner’s city planning and investment horizon.
It does not establish: A completion date for all seventeen precincts, or the handover date in a home contract.
The company statement does not provide an individual schedule for each precinct. Its publication date is not verified; a relative social-post age is not used as a date.
WHAT WOULD MAKE THIS A YEAR-ROUND CITY?
WATG’s July account describes phased planning, places that define the destination, and activity beyond peak summer. The checks below are guide questions, not a delivery forecast.
A whole-city plan can be developed in smaller parts.
What to checkWhich named area has a dated launch, approved drawing and defined work package?
Read the related guide →Major institutions and destinations help give the city its identity.
What to checkWhich operator is appointed, what is being built, and what is actually open?
Read the related guide →Homes, services and activities outside the main summer season support the long-term aim.
What to checkWhat works in the months you will use your home: shops, healthcare, transport and services?
Read the related guide →| Subject | Established here | Still unknown | Next useful reading |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current precinct register | Wadi is independently identified as the first of seventeen precincts. | A complete, current, individually named approved register. | Read the current diagram separately from working names. |
| Internal transport | The supplied June kit illustrates rapid transit; the masterplanner mentions transport links. | An approved internal route, stop list, operating date or timetable. | Keep city transport concepts separate from the regional rail project. |
| Development sequence | The masterplanner describes phased delivery over a long horizon. | An individual launch and opening order for all the other precincts. | Use dated announcements and package reports, without filling the gaps. |
| Land use | Publisher illustrations show urban business, residential, leisure and waterfront settings. | A current approved zoning match between every illustrated area and each precinct. | Read legal zones as a separate document layer. |
All three illustrations are credited by WATG to Broadway Malyan, the lead masterplanner, in its article dated 26 June 2026. Each retains the complete original frame and pixel dimensions. Artwork dates and current approval are unknown. No photographic construction, geographic registration, exact home collection, building height or legal boundary is inferred from them.
Broadway Malyan’s own company post establishes its stated masterplanning role and planning horizon. WATG describes its hospitality advisory role; its 31 July 2026 company press review reports the long-term destination strategy. These are participant accounts, not independent validation of future demand, investment performance or service opening. Existing hotel-count differences remain in the hospitality comparison.
Masterplanner statement · Adviser and artwork publication · July strategy account. The guide’s image observations and practical questions are editorial readings. No source gives a full current precinct register or an internal transit route here.
LAND / DOCUMENTS / THE CITY MAP
The city’s economic land needs its own reading. The working plan’s “Special Free Zone” label, a private service free zone and industrial land south of the city come from different records. Their names do not establish one shared parcel.
Additional government evidence reviewed 15 October 2026 · earlier planning records retained
A label on the working city drawing
Working drawing label
The original drawing places this name on a closed shape. The guide can show that source shape.
Still unknown: It is not verified as the same boundary as either government zone below. The working name is not an extra city precinct.
Pending-Approval technical brochure, page 12 · Publication and approval not verified
A 2024 government decision
Decision text reviewed
The decision approves a private service free zone under the Ras El Hekma light-industries and services company.
Still unknown: The attached map and coordinate table have not been inspected here. This does not establish the zone’s location, today’s tenants or an individual homeowner’s tax treatment.
Cabinet Decision 29/2024 · Issued 7 May 2024; publication date not verified
A 2026 land-allocation proposal
Cabinet approved a draft
The report describes proposed land for the Industrial Development Authority, for industrial, service and logistics activities south of Ras El Hekma city.
Still unknown: The report is not the issued presidential decision or its map. The guide does not convert this rounded land figure into an exact surveyed square-metre area.
Cabinet report, item 5 · Government report 4 June 2026
An authority’s public register
Listed by the industrial authority
The authority lists an industrial zone south of Ras El Hekma city under its responsibility, citing Decision313/2026.
Still unknown: The row does not supply an inspected decree, map, tenants or operating status. A one-to-one parcel match with the June proposal is not established here.
Presidential Decision 313/2026, as listed by IDA · Register reviewed 15 October 2026; page publication not stated
The June government report approves a draft. The industrial authority’s register cites Decision 313/2026. The guide has not inspected the issued decree and its annex to establish a one-to-one parcel match between them.
The 17.08 million m² service-zone figure and 4,317.1-feddan proposal are kept in their stated units. They are not added, subtracted or used to claim that one zone expanded into the other.
“South of the city” is a source description. A coordinate annex and its coordinate system are needed before drawing the parcel on a geographic map.
That match is not established. Similar names, related economic purposes or similar-sized figures do not prove the same parcel.
No additional precinct is counted here. A land-allocation record and a developer’s precinct register describe different things.
No current factories, freight routes, construction, noise levels, employment totals or distance from a particular home are established by these records.
The full State Information Service report dated 4 June 2026 was read in Arabic; item 5 establishes Cabinet approval of the land-allocation draft, its 4,317.1-feddan figure, the Industrial Development Authority and the industrial, service and logistics purposes. It does not establish completed works or the issued decree’s full terms. The separate IDA public register lists Decision 313/2026 but does not give the area in its reviewed row.
The private service-zone reading uses the official printing-office text of Cabinet Decision 29/2024, dated 7 May 2024. Its attached map and coordinate table have not been inspected. The named working shape uses the existing page-12 native drawing detail, with its original approval uncertainty and source credits. No official precinct ID, common boundary, current business eligibility or legal right for an individual home is inferred.
Cabinet report · Industrial authority register · Private service decision text · Working drawing method. Other news reports and uninspected annexes do not supply map coordinates here.
WORKING NAMES / FILM SCENES / CURRENT LAUNCH
Seen Canal Beach, Seatown or West Dunes in a plan or video? Find the name here, see its source position or scene, and check what is actually known about its launch.
Modon names Wadi Yemm as the first launch. The individual identities and launch status of the other sixteen are not verified here. This index compares source names; it is not a new list of twenty-one approved precincts.
All 21 compared names shown. Canal Beach selected. Names are not an approved precinct count.
“Not among the audited labels” only describes these documents. It does not mean the name has never been used elsewhere.
| Name | Working drawing · page 12 | Concept film | Current launch reading |
|---|---|---|---|
| Printed name · place label | Not among the four audited labels | Wadi Yemm: first launch named by Modon | |
| Printed name · place label | Printed name · 13.5 seconds | Individual status not verified | |
| Printed name · place label | Not among the four audited labels | Individual status not verified | |
| Printed name · place label | Not among the four audited labels | Individual status not verified | |
| Printed name · zone label | Not among the four audited labels | Individual status not verified | |
| Printed name · place label | Not among the four audited labels | Individual status not verified | |
| Printed name · place label | Not among the four audited labels | Individual status not verified | |
| Printed name · place label | Not among the four audited labels | Individual status not verified | |
| Printed name · place label | Not among the four audited labels | Individual status not verified | |
| Printed name · place label | Not among the four audited labels | Individual status not verified | |
| Printed name · place label | Not among the four audited labels | Individual status not verified | |
| Printed name · place label | Not among the four audited labels | Individual status not verified | |
| Printed name · place label | Not among the four audited labels | Individual status not verified | |
| Printed name · place label | Not among the four audited labels | Individual status not verified | |
| Printed name · place label | Not among the four audited labels | Individual status not verified | |
| Printed name · place label | Printed name · 98.5 seconds | Individual status not verified | |
| Printed name · place label | Not among the four audited labels | Individual status not verified | |
| Printed name · place label | Not among the four audited labels | Individual status not verified | |
| Printed name · marine label | Not among the four audited labels | Individual status not verified | |
| Not among the 19 audited labels | Printed name · 27.5 seconds | Individual status not verified | |
| Not among the 19 audited labels | Printed name · 95 seconds | Individual status not verified |
No names match. Try a shorter name or choose all compared names.
No. This index combines names from different documents. The working drawing includes place, zone and marine labels. The current Modon city page describes seventeen precincts. These are different counts.
The reviewed sources do not establish that. Similar scenery, the order of film scenes or a missing name on one drawing cannot prove that a district was renamed or moved.
The working drawing prints both names separately. The film also uses the broad name Marina. No one-to-one match to a current marina, approved precinct or berth is established.
They have separate project and announcement evidence in the guide. Montage and Nammos are announced within Wadi; Hacienda has its own relationship and name questions. They are not added to this source-name comparison as extra approved city precincts.
The working drawing has nineteen audited leader-line names: seventeen place labels, one zone label and one marine label. The film has four retained named scenes. Canal Beach and Marina match by spelling; Seatown and Seatown Cliffs add two other names to this comparison. The resulting twenty-one distinct names are not an approved precinct register, a count of launches or evidence of renamed districts.
Only Wadi Yemm’s current first-launch relationship is independently identified by Modon’s current city page. The working drawing’s native curves and marker centres are kept in their original PDF page coordinates. No working marker moves to the public diagram or a film scene. A film name without a working-label match receives no invented map marker. Different document types and unknown publication dates prevent a verified renaming sequence or parcel match.
Current city page · Working drawing · Concept film. Wider context: city, Wadi and home collections; Hacienda names; awarded work packages.
THE CITY / A CONNECTED OVERVIEW
Start with the city precincts. Look inside Wadi. Then separate named construction work from the wider land and planning zones.
Reviewed 15 October 2026 · original source dates retained
City precincts: Wadi is identified; the other sixteen have no individual status verified here.
First launched precinct identified by Modon.
Individual names, launches and outlines still need verification.
Seven home-collection groups and two announced hospitality names are separate from the city precinct count.
Separate project relationship; assignment to a Modon precinct is not verified.
Read the Hacienda relationship →Use the geographic locator for accepted cape and project reference points. A project reference is not a gate or property outline.
Open the coast locator →Use the original plan’s legend. Its numbers can change between editions and are not fixed city precinct IDs.
Compare the October legends →Read the dated report and its scope. A named brand, award, work package and operating facility describe different things.
Check the work records →LAND AND PLANNING / SIX DOCUMENT READINGS
The 2024 decision texts describe land allocation and legal zones. They do not provide a verified one-to-one match to Modon’s 17 precincts in this guide. The area comparison shows size only.
Presidential Decision 55/2024
Later official decisions cite 170.8 million m² allocated for New Ras El Hekma city.
Still unresolved: The original attached map was replaced. This figure is not a register of sold homes or precinct boundaries.
Presidential Decision 151/2024
The official texts cite a replacement map and coordinate table for Decision 55/2024.
Still unresolved: The replacement annex has not been inspected here. The older map cannot stand in for it.
Prime Minister Decision 1506/2024 · issued 7 May 2024
The decision describes a 153.72 km² investment zone and licenses the project company to develop and manage it.
Still unresolved: A legal zone is not a sales precinct. Its current boundary and relationship to each Modon precinct are not mapped here.
Cabinet Decision 29/2024 · issued 7 May 2024
The decision approves a 17.08 km² private service free zone under Ras El Hekma Light and Service Industries.
Still unresolved: This does not establish the tax treatment of a home, an operating facility or a separate launched residential precinct.
Prime Minister Decision 1508/2024 · issued 7 May 2024
The decision establishes a specialized international tourism seaport for yachts and tourist vessels, subject to its attached coordinates.
Still unresolved: The annex is not inspected. No match to a particular marina in a brochure, working berth or public entry is confirmed.
IDA register · Presidential Decision 313/2026
The authority’s industrial-area register names a zone south of Ras El Hekma city in Matrouh.
Still unresolved: Its exact outline, area and operation are not verified here. It is not assumed to be the earlier 10 km² cooperation proposal or the 2024 service free zone.
The official texts cite Decision 151/2024 as replacing the map and coordinate table attached to Decision 55/2024. An older allocation drawing therefore cannot be treated as the replacement. The coordinate annexes and their coordinate system have not been inspected here, so no legal-zone outline is drawn on the coast.
153.72 + 17.08 equals 170.8 km². Matching totals alone do not verify that the two zone polygons form a complete, non-overlapping division. These historical readings do not establish current legal status, a home’s tax treatment, ownership rights or operating services.
The Modon drawings and existing Wadi image reading point are reused from the precinct reader. No new parcel, geographic overlay or current precinct ID is inferred. September, June and the undated city diagram remain separate editions. Modon’s public 17-precinct framework and first Wadi launch are the basis of the city overview; the home-collection and hospitality groupings are the guide’s reading of their separate records.
The printing-office decision texts were reviewed through publicly indexed official text. Direct document retrieval could not be verified; coordinate annexes were not inspected. The three decisions carry issue dates of 7 May 2024. Their publication days are not independently verified here. Allocation and map-revision references are cited in those later official texts. The industrial authority’s current register is a separate source with no stated page publication date.
Investment-zone decision · Private service free zone · Tourism-port decision · Industrial authority register. The existing six-edition reader, name tree and works reader remain below.
SOURCE PLANS / LINKED READING
Each drawing keeps its own image coordinates. The ring marks an illustration reading point; it is never a gate or surveyed boundary.
Wadi Yemm on the official city diagram. Select a home collection to open a plan with its accepted reading point.
Launched: first sales launch identified, not whole-area completion.
Documented collection: appears in supplied sales or plan material, not confirmed current stock.
Hospitality announced: named hotel/residence destination, not an operating venue.
Awarded package: a named construction scope, not the whole precinct or a confirmed handover.
Unknown: the reviewed evidence does not establish the answer.
The gold area is Modon’s Wadi Yemm highlight. Other shapes are left as published. We do not give them invented precinct numbers or turn a visible shape into a named launch. The city diagram’s publication date is not stated; 14 October is our review date.
READ THE LEGEND / NOT A PRECINCT NUMBER
The September and two October drawings use different keys. For example, the October Wadi East drawing labels Wadi West Townhouses “17”. That is a key inside Wadi, not proof of the seventeenth city precinct.
| Name | September plan key | October Boulevard key | October Wadi East key |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yemm Boulevard | 12 | 1 | 14 |
| Beach Plaza | 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Wadi East & West | 8 · East & West | 2 · East & West | 1 · East; 17 · West |
| Yemm Views | 7 | 3 | 2 |
| Yemm Fairways | 9 | 15 | 15 |
| Yemm Links Villas | 15 | 11 | 10 |
Use the original legend for the drawing you are reading. These keys are not sales stages, new phases or fixed city precinct IDs. The six original drawings retain their labels.
READ THE RELATIONSHIPS
Beach Plaza, Boulevard and the other documented collections sit within Wadi. Montage and Nammos are announced destinations within Wadi. Hacienda’s city relationship is inferred from separate partner publications; its assignment to a Modon precinct is unknown.
Modon calls these city divisions precincts. This reader uses that term, rather than treating them as four equal quadrants. The June “17+ precincts & free zone” label is kept beside the public 17-precinct description, with no invented eighteenth precinct.
GEOGRAPHIC CONTEXT / SEPARATE COORDINATES
The cape and Hacienda reference use existing accepted geographic coordinates. Wadi’s illustration stays in Modon’s source frame because its exact geographic boundary is not verified. Matching-looking coastlines alone do not establish a surveyed overlay.
Open the coast locator → Compare the geographic project references →DATES / WHAT EACH DATE MEANS
Modon’s FY2025 release reports initial Ras El Hekma sales and calls Wadi Yemm the first district. The reporting year does not establish an exact launch day or completed homes.
Read more →Whole-city design, 17+ precincts & free zone, Wadi components and home material. Proposed content, not completion.
Read more →Named destination within Wadi Yemm; includes several components under one name.
Read more →Additional named home collections appear in a different drawing. Names are not promoted to city precincts.
Read more →Boulevard and Wadi East brochures show different numbering and legends. Both original views are retained without carrying September anchors into them. Receipt date does not establish publication or launch date.
Read more →Modon still describes 17 precincts and Wadi Yemm as the first launch. The schematic names Wadi only. Review date is not the map’s publication date.
Read more →Year-only and month-only dates remain at that precision. No exact launch day is inferred from a results-reporting year. A sales announcement is not a completed-home or operating-facility certificate.
THE OPEN QUESTIONS
The reviewed current page and city diagram do not provide a complete named register.
The other sixteen are not declared definitely unannounced. Their individual status is not verified here.
Image positions and the Hacienda project reference do not establish parcel boundaries or working gates.
Generic hotel symbols are not assigned to Montage or Nammos without a source identifying that match.
An airport, free zone or business district is not automatically an extra launched precinct.
The earlier pending-approval technical brochure and undated concept-film labels are not promoted to current official precinct identities.
Original plan artwork © Modon. Exact existing field-atlas source positions are reused within each edition; the whole-city design has no accepted name anchors. None of the six images has a verified geographic registration. Plan symbols and home collections are not a city precinct register. The two October brochure views have different numbering and legends. Their names are not matched to city precinct IDs or carried over from September. The fixed SVG downloads keep their default readings.
Current city description checked 14 October 2026. The city diagram keeps the original copy reviewed 28 September; its publication date is unknown. June source pages 9, 13, 18, 21, 23 and 25 were visually inspected again. The page 23 numbers identify fifteen categories of Wadi components; they are not fifteen city precincts. Current Modon announcements place Montage and Nammos in Wadi. Older record dates remain with their detailed guides.
Current city framework · Supplied June toolkit · September plan · 2025 reporting-year evidence.
CITY CONNECTIONS / THE GEOGRAPHIC MAP
Compare the cape, major roads and rail records in one geographic frame, with historical relief and station records you can inspect separately.
Open the coastal rail atlas →INSIDE THE FIRST CITY PRECINCT
Explore the Wadi sports, club, golf and equestrian descriptions beside their original brochure-map labels. Keep planned facilities separate from home-specific membership.
Read the Wadi facilities overview →MODON / CITY WORKS, PACKAGE BY PACKAGE
A precinct can contain several projects and work packages. A road can serve a wider phase. A partnership can cover more than one country. Keep those scopes separate before putting a name on the map.
Eight selected readings · source review 15 October 2026 · no new city precincts assigned
Wadi is identified. The exact DP04 package site is not mapped.
M1: ACC uses “Wadi Yemm – M1 Precinct”. The source establishes the Wadi relationship; it does not give the complete register of the other city precincts.
DP04: the contractor’s work-package name. It is not a separate city precinct or a general sales-phase number.
Phase 1: the scope served by the reported ring-road works. No shared boundary with every other “Phase 1” label is inferred.
THE DP04 NUMBERS / DIFFERENT BASES
The contractor’s figures describe different things. Combined built-up area includes villas and a clubhouse; it is not the land parcel or a per-villa average. Park, landscape and road areas are not added together because their overlap is not stated.
| Quantity | What is measured | How to read it |
|---|---|---|
| 54 villas | Residential count within DP04 | Not all Wadi homes or delivered homes. |
| 58,936 m² | Combined built-up area: villas and clubhouse | Not a land parcel or the size of each villa. |
| 230,792 m² | Wadi Park area in the awarded scope | No opening, surveyed boundary or separate addition to all other landscape areas inferred. |
| More than 60,000 m² | Public landscaping | Its overlap with park or other areas is not specified. |
| About 68,000 m² | Road area within the package | Area, not road length or an open route. |
| 21 months | Construction programme | No verified start date; no calendar completion date calculated. |
The programme is 21 months, with no verified start date. This reader therefore does not turn it into a completion month or a home handover promise.
READ THE DOCUMENT TYPE
The 2024 Hassan Allam cooperation announcement and the named 2026 awards are separate documents. The guide does not infer that they form one contract or occupy one area. Portaluna’s opening preparations do not establish its city precinct or membership of Wadi’s six hotels.
The Modon–LuLu release describes retail cooperation across the UAE and Egypt portfolio. It does not name a Ras El Hekma store. It is kept here to explain the scope, rather than placed in the local grocery directory.
Awarded package · publication date not stated
ACC identifies a 54-villa and clubhouse package within Wadi Yemm–M1, with roads, utilities, public spaces and Wadi Park. Its 21-month programme has no verified start date here.
Still unknown: DP04 is a contractor package label. It is not a new city precinct or a confirmed package boundary. The 21 months cannot give a calendar completion date without a start date.
Works reported · 2026-06-30
The contractor reports about 17 km of six-lane road with utility networks, intended to support Phase 1.
Still unknown: The reported length does not locate the road line, establish public access or show which home has working utility connections.
Works reported · 2026-06-30
The contractor reports 5.3 km of dry bulk excavation for the Grand Canal.
Still unknown: Excavation is not confirmation of a filled or navigable canal. No accepted route, working berth or direct match to every canal-side home is established.
Awarded package · 2026-07-06
The award covers a 200-key hotel, 96 private branded villas, clubhouse and associated works. Modon’s separate announcement places Montage in Wadi.
Still unknown: Hotel keys and private villas are different counts. The award does not establish opening, ownership rights, a home handover or the exact works boundary.
Design and construction award · 2026-07-15
The design capacity is 32,000 m³ per day. The announced process treats sewage for intended reuse in irrigation and district cooling.
Still unknown: Design capacity is not actual daily flow. This is not drinking-water supply or proof that the plant or a household connection is commissioned.
MoU / cooperation · 2024-11-19
The earlier MoU explores construction and infrastructure cooperation, including energy and water-related work.
Still unknown: A broad MoU is separate from a named construction award. We do not infer that all later packages are one contract or occupy one area.
Opening preparations reported · 2026-09-08
The dated government visit report describes final opening preparations. Separate brand material identifies Portaluna as a Morgans Originals property.
Still unknown: The visit report does not explicitly make Portaluna one of Wadi’s six hotels. Its city precinct, entrance, guest opening and bookable dates remain unestablished here.
MoU / cooperation · 2024-10-25
The agreement covers retail cooperation across Modon’s UAE and Egypt portfolio and the search for suitable sites.
Still unknown: The release does not name a Ras El Hekma store. No precinct, store pin, opening, local delivery or grocery service is assigned from it.
ACC’s public project page does not state its publication or construction start date. Hassan Allam’s road/canal report is dated 30 June 2026; Montage’s award 6 July; wastewater award 15 July. Modon’s Hassan Allam MoU is dated 19 November 2024, and its LuLu portfolio agreement 25 October 2024. The Portaluna reading uses the dated 8 September 2026 government report and earlier brand evidence, rather than a new operating confirmation.
Sources explicitly put DP04 and Montage within Wadi. The map ring marks the existing Wadi image reading point, not the exact package, hotel or building. The original Modon diagram copy was reviewed 28 September; its publication date is unknown and its current binary identity is not claimed. The 17-precinct framework remains unchanged. No physical site inspection, entrance, road alignment, opening, utility commissioning, finished-home count or overall completion percentage is established by these selected documents.
ACC scope · Road/canal report · Montage award · Wastewater award · Earlier cooperation · LuLu scope.
ADDED EVIDENCE / CITY → PRECINCT → WORK PACKAGE
A work package is one contractor’s part of a development. Its code may sound like a precinct or a home collection, but the connection needs evidence. Here are four readings with the limits kept visible.
Reviewed 15 October 2026 · company statements and clearly labelled press reporting
Company announcement
Arabian Construction Company
July 2026 · publication month
ACC’s separate July news article identifies the same 54-villa and clubhouse package within Wadi Yemm–M1.
The villa mix is 30 five-bedroom and 24 seven-bedroom homes. The stated programme is 21 months.
The source places DP04 within Wadi. The package site and its match to a home collection remain unverified.
The article does not provide a verified start or a calendar handover date. It is not a second 54-villa award.
Does your home appear in the DP04 allocation, and what start and handover dates apply to its contract?
Company announcement
CCC–Rowad joint venture
Company post · absolute date unverified
Rowad names an award for multilevel basement structures within Wadi Yemm.
The company identifies its joint venture with Consolidated Contractors Company for this scope.
The source names Wadi. It does not locate the basement on an accepted plan or identify the homes above it.
Area 2 is a work-package name. It is not the city’s second precinct or proof that buildings above it are ready.
Which buildings use this basement, and who confirms their parking and access arrangements?
Company announcement
Rowad–Elsewedy Electric TD consortium
Company post · absolute date unverified
Rowad also announces a separate electrical-substation extension award.
This power-infrastructure scope names a different partner group from the Wadi basement award.
No precinct, exact site or home-service area is assigned from this post.
An award does not establish that the equipment is live or that a home has permanent electricity.
Who supplies your building, and has its permanent electricity connection been approved and tested?
Press report · direct award document not reviewed
Innovo Build–Redcon alliance
29 September 2026 · report date
Daily News Egypt reports a DP03 East infrastructure and residential contract within Wadi Yemm.
It reports over EGP 12 billion, around 323,000 m² of built-up space, over 660 homes and a 21-month programme.
The press report names Wadi. DP03 East is not automatically the Wadi East home collection or an approved parcel.
The guide has not reviewed a direct client or consortium award document. The report date is not a verified signing or start date.
Which sales buildings fall inside the signed DP03 East scope, and what dated programme covers them?
AN OPEN DIFFERENCE / NOT AN EXTRA NAMED PRECINCT
Page checked 15 October 2026
The developer’s current framework; Wadi named as first launch.
Source record →July 2026 · month only
The contractor uses a different city-wide count. It does not name an eighteenth precinct.
Source record →The guide keeps Modon’s current seventeen-precinct framework and shows the contractor’s different wording. The sources do not explain the difference. We do not invent an eighteenth name or assume that adding a free zone resolves it.
TWO PRESS DESCRIPTIONS / NO VERIFIED CALENDAR
| Report date | Duration described | Scope identified |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-10 | 18 months | Earlier report: Redcon–Innovo residential and infrastructure work; eighteen months from signing. No DP03 East code. Source → |
| 2026-09-29 | 21 months | Later report: DP03 East; twenty-one months. No verified construction start. Source → |
The earlier story describes the consortium without the DP03 East code. The later story names DP03 East. These details do not prove the same signed scope or an amended programme. Neither report gives the guide a verified start from which to calculate your handover.
Match its building and home number to the signed work scope. A similar sales name is not enough.
Check permanent power, water, access and parking separately. A city infrastructure award does not confirm the connection to your building.
Ask for the dated programme and the delivery terms in your own agreement. Publication month and construction duration cannot replace those.
The earlier undated ACC project page stays intact. The separate July-dated company article adds a publication month for that article, not an exact award or start date. Its M1 label is a contractor description for Wadi; no complete current city precinct-ID register is established. DP04 is not counted twice.
Rowad’s public company post names two scopes with different partner groups. Its relative social-media age is not converted to a date. The post’s comments, individual profiles and job advertisements are not used as project evidence. For DP03 East, direct client or consortium documentation was not obtained; the newspaper description remains press reporting. The two September stories are not promoted to a verified revision history.
No package receives a point, polygon, sales-collection allocation or home completion date. The public city diagram remains in its original image frame. Original artwork © Modon; independent relationship reading by HEKMA. Wider detail: city overview, earlier eight work scopes, water plans and connections, supplied site films.
No JavaScript is needed for this reading. The saved file includes the diagram, all text, comparisons and both exports. Wider guide and source links need internet.
THE CITY / THE PHASE / THE PACKAGE / THE DRAWING KEY
A number can refer to a whole-city count, a work area or a key inside one drawing. A work package is one contractor’s part of the job. Knowing which kind of number you have helps you understand what belongs where.
Reviewed 15 October 2026 · six readings · no approved precinct-ID register
City framework
Modon describes seventeen precincts and names Wadi Yemm as its first launch.
This is a city-wide count. It does not give Wadi a precinct number or supply an approved list of the other sixteen names.
Wadi is named on the public diagram. The other shapes remain individually unidentified here.
Source publication date not verified · reviewed 2026-10-15
Read the related entry →Work-phase and area labels
WTD describes structural works for Area 2 at Wadi Yemm within Phase 1A, working with CCC and Rowad.
Area 2 is not city precinct 2. This post does not define the rest of Phase 1A or identify a buyer’s collection or home.
Keep the area off the geographic map until an accepted location or boundary is available.
Source publication date not verified · reviewed 2026-10-15
Read the related entry →ACC construction package
ACC’s July 2026 article names DP04 within Wadi Yemm–M1 and describes villas, a clubhouse and associated works.
No match between M1 and Phase 1A is verified. DP04 is not city precinct 4, and the award is not completion of Wadi.
The package has no accepted boundary in this guide. Do not colour a whole precinct as complete.
Publication: 2026-07 · reviewed 2026-10-15
Read the related entry →Package named in a press report
The 29 September Daily News Egypt report names Innovo Build–Redcon and a DP03 East package at Wadi Yemm.
A direct developer or consortium award document has not been verified here. “East” does not establish a match to the sales collection Wadi East.
Do not place this package on the Wadi East brochure just because both names contain East.
Publication: 2026-09-29 · reviewed 2026-10-15
Read the related entry →Numbers in brochure legends
On page 21, the supplied Boulevard brochure uses key 1 for Boulevard. The supplied Wadi East brochure uses key 14 for Boulevard.
These are keys inside two separate drawings. Neither is Boulevard’s city precinct number, and their difference alone does not prove a change on the ground.
Use the original legend with its own drawing. Do not move the point or number from one edition to another.
Source publication date not verified · reviewed 2026-10-15
Read the related entry →Contractor-listed active work
CCC’s own Active project view includes Ras El Hekma basement works in its Egypt list.
This is CCC’s classification, not an independent site inspection. Its entry does not identify Phase 1A or Area 2, define a boundary or confirm completion.
Read it alongside the separate Rowad and WTD descriptions, while keeping the different scope wording visible.
Source publication date not verified · reviewed 2026-10-15
Read the related entry →No JavaScript is needed. The saved file includes the complete diagram, all readings, home questions and both exports. Wider guide/source links need internet.
Back to the city atlas chapters ↑CITY INFRASTRUCTURE / WATER
A plant’s published capacity is useful evidence. To understand service for a home, also check the project’s stage, the network, the operator and the connection. These two city records describe different parts of the water system.
Additional company-report evidence reviewed 15 October 2026 · earlier work-scope records retained
Listed in a company investment plan
Treating seawater for water supply
Cox lists a Ras El Hekma seawater reverse-osmosis project in two investment-plan tables. Both show the same capacity and the same NTP year. The second report is another record of the plan, not another plant.
These reports do not establish a Modon contract award to Cox, a working plant, a verified plant site or water supply to a particular home.
Design-and-construction award reported
Treating used water for planned reuse
Hassan Allam reports an award to Hassan Allam Construction with MetiPro. It describes plans to reuse treated water for watering landscaped areas and for shared cooling systems.
An award establishes a named work scope. It does not establish completed tests, actual treatment today, an appointed utility operator or a sewer connection for every home.
Cox’s later report repeats the same project name, capacity and NTP year. It is another record of the plan; it does not establish a second plant or physical progress.
| Record | What the source gives | What it establishes here |
|---|---|---|
| Year ended 31 December 2025PDF page 184 · printed page 175 | 160 K m3/d NTP column: 2026 | Investment-plan entryOpening, current output, plant position and a home’s connection are not established. |
| Half-year ended 30 June 2026PDF page 86 · printed page 81 | 160 K m3/d NTP column: 2026 | Investment-plan entryOpening, current output, plant position and a home’s connection are not established. |
| Contractor announcement 15 July 2026Published contractor announcement | 32,000 m3/day | Design-and-construction awardOpening, current output, plant position and a home’s connection are not established. |
READ THE UNIT
The table uses K for thousand. The figure is a capacity in the investment plan, not measured water production today.
READ THE YEAR COLUMN
It does not label this as an opening or home-handover date. This guide keeps the column’s wording and does not turn it into a completion promise.
KEEP THE FLOWS SEPARATE
One record concerns seawater desalination. The other concerns treating used water, with planned reuse for watering landscaped areas and shared cooling systems. Their figures do not establish a supply-and-demand balance, the population served or a ratio of used water to water supplied.
WHAT CAN GO ON THE MAP?
These reviewed records do not give a verified plant site, service boundary, pipe route or assignment to each precinct. The guide keeps those positions unknown. It does not place a plant at a generic utility symbol or at the centre of Wadi.
Ask for the exact supply arrangement and the phase it serves. A city-wide project name is not a connection record for one building.
Ask for the water and sewer operators, account setup, tariffs, meter arrangements and responsibility for shared pumps or tanks.
Ask for the connection and commissioning records for the home’s phase, including any temporary supply arrangement and its costs.
Ask for dated water-quality test reports, the sampling point, testing responsibility and the procedure for service interruptions.
Ask which sewer and treatment arrangements serve the home, and how treated-water reuse is kept separate from domestic supply.
Keep the 2026 NTP table entry separate from a completion, opening or handover date. Ask for the project-specific written programme before relying on a date.
Cox’s 2025 annual-report investment-plan section is on physical PDF pages 181–184, with the water table on page 184 (printed 175). The half-year report for 30 June 2026 uses the same investment-plan context on physical pages 84–86; the water table is on page 86 (printed 81). Both list “Modon Ras El Hekma SWRO”, 160 under K m3/d, and 2026 under NTP. The reporting-period dates are retained separately from unknown document-publication dates. The company’s April 2024 glossary defines SWRO as seawater reverse osmosis and K as thousand; that glossary does not establish a Ras El Hekma contract.
Hassan Allam’s 15 July 2026 release reports the design-and-construction award with MetiPro and a 32,000 m³/day sewage-treatment capacity. Its described treatment and reuse are design intentions. A construction contractor is not assumed to be the appointed utility operator.
This reader does not establish a signed desalination award, commissioned capacity, current output, drinking-water test results, tariffs, every precinct’s service coverage or a particular home’s water and sewer connections. Company investment planning is also separate from approval of the city’s land-use plan. No area, price, return, total capacity or population estimate is calculated.
Cox annual-report entry · Cox half-year entry · Unit and acronym glossary · Wastewater award.
CITY → WADI YEMM → PLANNED COMPONENTS
The June plan shows more than home collections: a clinic area, promenade, lighthouse, water sports and other planned places. Select a component to find its own printed markers, then compare the related October labels.
June 2026 toolkit, page 23 · October brochure pages received 2 October 2026, publication dates unknown · reviewed 15 October 2026
These are components inside Wadi Yemm, not fifteen city precincts. A proposed place does not confirm that it is open or included with a home. Return to the city overview →
June 05 · Multi-faith Zone & Clinic Area. One printed marker. Each drawing keeps its own positions.
Each drawing keeps its own marker positions and page window. This is a comparison of words and scope; it does not prove that two labels identify the same site or building.
Six hospitality markers in June. Five hotel markers in each October drawing. That difference is visible in the illustrations. It does not establish that a hotel was removed. The five June Branded Residences markers also cannot be assigned to individual brands from these legends. Read the named hotel announcements →
| June component | June markers | October Boulevard | October Wadi East |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01 · The Boulevard | 1 | 1 Yemm Boulevard Apartments 9 Retail F&B | 7 Retail F&B 14 Yemm Boulevard Apartments |
| 02 · Beach Promenade | 1 | No separate related legend entry | No separate related legend entry |
| 03 · Beach & Amphitheatre | 1 | 8 Beach | 8 Pristine Beach |
| 04 · Coastal Park/Natural Reserve | 1 | 4 Natural Reserve | 3 Natural Reserve |
| 05 · Multi-faith Zone & Clinic Area | 1 | No separate related legend entry | No separate related legend entry |
| 06 · 18-hole Championship Golf Courses | 2 | 13 Golf Course | 12 Golf Course |
| 07 · Golf Clubhouse | 1 | 12 Country Clubhouse 14 Country Clubhouse | 11 Country Clubhouse 13 Country Clubhouse |
| 08 · Equestrian Centre | 1 | 16 Equestrian Club | 16 Equestrian Club |
| 09 · Hospitality Assets | 6 | 5 Hotel & Resorts | 4 Hotel & Resorts |
| 10 · Branded Residences | 5 | No separate related legend entry | No separate related legend entry |
| 11 · Sports & Leisure Centre | 1 | 6 Sports Facility | 5 Sports Facility |
| 12 · Iconic Lighthouse | 1 | No separate related legend entry | No separate related legend entry |
| 13 · Country Club | 1 | 12 Country Clubhouse 14 Country Clubhouse | 11 Country Clubhouse 13 Country Clubhouse |
| 14 · Natural Lagoons | 1 | 10 Natural Lagoons | 9 Natural Lagoons |
| 15 · Water Sports | 1 | No separate related legend entry | No separate related legend entry |
JUNE 01 / 1 MARKER
A street setting and homes are different things.
June names The Boulevard. The October legends separately name Yemm Boulevard Apartments and Retail F&B (shops, food and drink). These labels can help you read the plans; they do not establish one common boundary.
What to check: Which building is the home in, and which shops or restaurants are actually open?
JUNE 02 / 1 MARKER
The promenade is a separate June component.
Neither October legend has a separate Beach Promenade entry. Their beach labels do not by themselves identify a continuous walking route.
What to check: Is there a completed walking route from the home, and who may use it?
JUNE 03 / 1 MARKER
June combines the beach and amphitheatre.
October has Beach or Pristine Beach labels, but no separate Amphitheatre legend entry. The related beach markers are shown without assuming they locate the June amphitheatre.
What to check: Where is the performance space, and what event, access and noise arrangements apply?
JUNE 04 / 1 MARKER
The park and reserve wording changes.
June groups Coastal Park/Natural Reserve. October uses Natural Reserve. Similar wording does not establish a legal protected-area boundary or public entry.
What to check: What is the approved land use, and what access is included with the home?
JUNE 05 / 1 MARKER
A clinic area is planned, not an emergency directory.
The June legend combines a multi-faith zone and clinic area under one marker. Neither October legend gives this a separate entry. No clinic name, emergency capability, operator or opening is established.
What to check: Which medical provider is open today, and what services does it offer?
JUNE 06 / 2 MARKERS
One legend entry appears at two golf markers.
June prints 18-hole Championship Golf Courses at two positions. Both October drawings also repeat Golf Course at two positions. These are labels in separate illustrations, not verified course boundaries or evidence of play.
What to check: Which course, opening date and membership terms apply to the home?
JUNE 07 / 1 MARKER
Golf Clubhouse is the June label.
The October legends each have two entries called Country Clubhouse. Both are shown as related labels; neither is declared to be the same building as the June Golf Clubhouse.
What to check: What is the exact clubhouse name and plan reference, and who can use it?
JUNE 08 / 1 MARKER
The equestrian component has its own marker.
June says Equestrian Centre; October says Equestrian Club. The related labels do not establish an open riding service, stable allocation or home membership.
What to check: Who operates the equestrian facility, and are visits, lessons or membership available?
JUNE 09 / 6 MARKERS
Six visible hospitality markers are a plan reading.
June repeats Hospitality Assets at six positions. October repeats Hotel & Resorts at five positions per drawing. Different marker counts do not establish a removed hotel or a new inventory. Montage and Nammos announcements do not identify every numbered site here.
What to check: Which named hotel is intended at the site, and what is its confirmed stage and owner access?
JUNE 10 / 5 MARKERS
Branded residences have five June markers.
The June component appears at five positions. Neither October legend has a separate Branded Residences entry. Do not attach Montage, Nammos or another brand to these markers without a matching allocation plan.
What to check: What brand, exact residence reference and signed service arrangement apply to the home?
JUNE 11 / 1 MARKER
Sports and leisure is one June entry.
The October label is Sports Facility. This comparison does not establish that every described sports, leisure or clubhouse service is on the same site or included with a home.
What to check: Which facility and services are included, when will they open, and what charges apply?
JUNE 12 / 1 MARKER
The lighthouse is named in June.
Neither October legend lists an Iconic Lighthouse. This is a missing legend entry, not proof of cancellation, completion, navigation use or public entry.
What to check: Is it retained in the current approved plan, and what access is intended?
JUNE 13 / 1 MARKER
Country Club is distinct from Golf Clubhouse in June.
June gives these two components separate numbers, 13 and 07. October has two Country Clubhouse entries. The names alone do not prove which October entry corresponds to either June component.
What to check: Ask for the dated facility plan and the home-specific access and membership terms.
JUNE 14 / 1 MARKER
Natural Lagoons is a plan label in all three drawings.
June uses 14; October Boulevard uses 10 and Wadi East uses 9. Each ring stays on its own source image. The June shoreline classification is not copied onto either October plan.
What to check: Which water area may the household use, and what are its water-management and access arrangements?
JUNE 15 / 1 MARKER
Water sports has a separate June marker.
Neither October legend has a separate Water Sports entry. No operator, launch point, permitted activity, booking service or operating season is established by this marker.
What to check: Which activities are permitted and available, and who operates them?
Original drawings © Modon. June is the edition printed on the toolkit; its exact publication day is unknown. The October pages are undated and were supplied together on 2 October. Their revision order is not established. All June rings follow the circle bounds and numbers in the original PDF. October rings use each original brochure’s own accepted circles. No positions, shorelines or boundaries are transferred between the drawings or placed on a satellite map.
Missing or renamed legend entries do not establish cancellation, a launched release, opening, brand allocation, home view or access rights. A full approved current plan and a home-specific facility schedule would answer different questions. The city’s precinct framework remains separate.
June component review · Read both complete October legends · Facility access and charges · Present healthcare reference
CITY RELEASE REGISTER / REVIEWED 15 OCTOBER 2026
Start with the city precinct. Then check the home collection or hospitality name inside it. A name on a drawing, a launch statement and a home available to buy are different records.
The 17 refers to the city framework. It is not a count of the products listed below.
Boulevard, East, West and the hospitality destinations sit at a different level from a city precinct.
A brochure or marketing post does not confirm that a particular home is still for sale, its price or its rights.
These labels describe the strongest record used here. They are not a progress score. Supplied sales material may accompany an announced project; it does not by itself establish an independently dated launch for each collection.
| Name and level | Evidence | What we can say | What still needs confirmation | Read it on the maps |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ras El Hekma cityCity framework | City framework Exact day unverified Evidence linksmodon city status oct15 | Modon describes a city with 17 precincts. Wadi Yemm is the named first launch. | A complete current list of individual precinct names, IDs, boundaries and release dates is not established. | Start with the complete city diagram. Its divisions are not a numbered launch register. Open the related reader → |
| Wadi YemmCity precinct | Dated company record 2026-02-18 | Named by Modon as the first launched precinct. The FY2025 results report initial sales; the H1 2026 results describe a later phase in April. | The exact first-launch day and the identity or boundary of the April phase are not established by those reports. | Use the city diagram to find Wadi, then the separate Wadi drawings to read its components. Open the related reader → |
| The other 16 precinctsUnresolved city register | Individual status unknown Exact day unverified | The city total leaves 16 precincts beyond Wadi. Older working names can be studied separately. | Their individual current launch states are unverified. Unknown does not mean unannounced, cancelled or unsold. | Do not assign the older working names to current diagram divisions without an approved match. Open the related reader → |
| Yemm BoulevardHome collection inside Wadi | Supplied sales material 2026-10-02 | Named in the supplied colour sheet and Boulevard brochure. Layouts, room dimensions and dated price evidence have separate readers. | The colour sheet does not establish live stock, a launch day or the surveyed boundary for a selected home. | Compare Boulevard in each drawing: its legend number changes between editions. Open the related reader → |
| Yemm Beach PlazaHome collection inside Wadi | Publisher marketing Exact day unverified | Appears in supplied plans and is also promoted as an apartment collection on the Ras El Hekma project profile. | The inspected posts do not provide a verified absolute launch date or a current unit list. | Use its own source markers; a coastal setting is not proof of access rights for every home. Open the related reader → |
| Wadi EastHome collection inside Wadi | Supplied sales material 2026-09-25 | Separately named on the supplied colour sheet. Some brochure legends group East and West; the Wadi East drawing separates them. | No launch day, approved cross-edition parcel identity or live home allocation is established here. | Read each source frame separately. A combined legend entry is not an additional city precinct. Open the related reader → |
| Wadi WestHome collection inside Wadi | Supplied sales material 2026-09-25 | Separately named on the supplied colour sheet. Some brochure legends group East and West; the Wadi East drawing separates them. | No launch day, approved cross-edition parcel identity or live home allocation is established here. | Read each source frame separately. A combined legend entry is not an additional city precinct. Open the related reader → |
| Waterfront ResidencesHome collection inside Wadi | Publisher marketing Exact day unverified | Has a Modon product page. An indexed repost on Modon’s company profile carries a launch statement from the project profile. | The absolute day of that post is unverified. Marketing availability does not confirm present stock, price or handover. | Use the Waterfront reader and its source views. No new precinct or boundary is assigned. Open the related reader → |
| Yemm ViewsHome collection inside Wadi | Publisher marketing Exact day unverified | The project profile markets Yemm Views as a villa collection, beyond its appearance in the brochure legends. | The post’s absolute publication day and the exact home site are unverified. A similar name does not establish a Links-to-Views rename. | The brochure comparison highlights Views separately from Links Villas. Open the related reader → |
| Fairways VillasHome collection inside Wadi | Supplied sales material Exact day unverified Evidence linksmodon june kit | A named villa collection in the supplied material and home-layout reader. | An exact public launch day, current stock and a surveyed collection boundary are not established in this register. | Read the home layouts beside the plan edition used for that collection. Open the related reader → |
| Yemm Links / Links VillasSupplied Wadi names | Supplied sales material Exact day unverified | The colour sheet prints YEMM LINKS. The three brochure legends use Links Villas; they also name Views separately. | A common parcel identity across the different labels and drawings has not been approved. | Compare the complete colour sheet and the individual brochure keys without joining their outlines. Open the related reader → |
| Lighthouse VillageSupplied Wadi name | Supplied sales material 2026-09-25 | Named on the supplied colour illustration. June’s plan separately names an Iconic Lighthouse component. | The two labels do not establish one approved site, one product or a shared operator. No launch day is verified. | Keep Lighthouse Village and Iconic Lighthouse in their own source frames. Open the related reader → |
| Montage Ras El HekmaHospitality and branded homes inside Wadi | Dated company record 2026-05-17 | Modon’s formal announcement names the hotel and residences within Wadi. | The announcement is not an opening certificate, current inventory or proof of rights for another home collection. | The name belongs inside the Wadi reading. Do not use a generic hotel marker as a verified resort boundary. Open the related reader → |
| Nammos Ras El HekmaHospitality and branded homes inside Wadi | Dated company record 2026-07-16 Evidence linksmodon nammos | Modon’s dated announcement places the destination within Wadi. | A brand announcement does not establish an operating resort, exact home allocation or access for other owners. | Keep the resort in Wadi’s hospitality layer; it is not another city precinct. Open the related reader → |
| Hacienda Ras El Hekma / Miran HillsSeparate development relationship | Separate city relationship Exact day unverified Evidence linksmiran rights | Palm Hills material documents the project and its own plan. The guide treats its relationship to Modon’s city separately. | No approved Modon precinct ID or registered match to a division on the city diagram is established. | Use the Hacienda plan reader. Do not force it into an unnamed Modon division. Open the related reader → |
A DATE NEEDS A MEANING
These records answer different questions. An attachment receipt tells us when a copy was shared. A report can describe an event months earlier. A page timestamp can belong to its content system.
2025 · Reporting period
The February 2026 results describe initial sales during FY2025. The report date is not the launch date.
2026-02-18 · Report publication
This is the publication day of the company results, not an exact day for the first Wadi launch.
2026-04 · Reported event month
The H1 report says a new Wadi phase launched in April. It does not identify that phase with a precinct ID, named collection, M1 or Phase 1A.
2026-05-17 · Formal announcement
A dated brand partnership announcement. Do not read it as the start of resort operations.
2026-06 · Printed edition month
The toolkit month dates this edition of the material. It does not give a launch day for each label on its plan.
2026-07-16 · Formal announcement
A dated brand announcement within Wadi; no present operating service is established.
2026-07-29 · Report publication
Reports on the six months ended 30 June, including the April phase and later Montage debut. Publication and event dates remain separate.
2026-09-25 · Attachment receipt
The supplied chat dates the sharing of the image. The image does not print a publication or revision day.
2026-10-02 · Attachment receipt
Receipt dates the supplied copy. It does not date the launch or establish the order of every plan revision.
Absolute date unverified · Absolute post day unverified
The public profile and indexed repost support named marketing and a Waterfront launch statement. Relative post ages are not converted into calendar dates.
2026-03-03 · Displayed content timestamp
The product detail displays 3 March 2026 at 12:02 beside content fields. That timestamp is not independently established as a launch day. The formal partnership announcement is dated 17 May.
The saved file includes the complete diagram, every entry, all date readings and both tables. No JavaScript is needed. Wider guide and source links need internet.
